Category Archives: thoughts – insane

hairy topics

It’s nice to have some conversation already scripted for you. For instance, when you are deciding how short to cut your hair, you can count on your barber (or hairdresser, whatever you choose to call it) saying, “I can cut it off all day, but I can’t put it back on.” Or some such equivalent statement.

And if someone asks you if you recently got a haircut, you’re pretty much required to reply, “no, I got them all cut.” The person who asks the question is obviously looking for that reply. Not doing so would let them down immensely.

video game scores

You know, video games have come a long way, but I still think that the some of the best video game sounds of all time and the best music of all time come from our old friend, the Atari 2600. Here are my all-time favorites:

Best sound: the “squish” sound in Dig Dug when you drop rocks on the monsters. Satisfyin’. Take that, Fygar!

Best music: yep, mom, it’s the music that you still remember after all these years…the lovely musical score of Pitfall II. (Da, da, da-da da da!) There were even three different types of music…

  • The happy, “I just got another gold bar that’s twice as big as my head but somehow I can carry with me” music,
  • The sad, “stupid condor just cost me another couple of thousand points” music,
  • And the “gee, nothing bad or good has happened in a while but we have to have music” music.

Ah…the memories come flooding back…

futile attempts at Christmas cheer

I will never be a match for Martha Stewart.

I already knew that, but I lent even more credence to that theory recently. I went to a store to buy some garland to put up on my porch, and some “garland ties” designed to fasten said garland to said porch. I also bought a couple of “Christmas sprays”. This was the store’s terminology, not mine. I would have called them “pine branch-looking thingies.” I was going to fashion these into a centerpiece for my dining room table.

About an hour later, I still hadn’t gotten the garland formed into a fashion that I liked. It was bitterly cold outside, and I was suffering from numb fingers trying to fasten the garland ties to the garland and the porch. The garland ties, made out of plastic, kept breaking when I tried to lock them into place. Each time one snapped, a little piece of my sanity snapped with it. I noted that the ties were “Santa’s Best” brand ties. I submit that if that’s the best Santa can do at making garland ties, he needs to outsource garland-tie making and stick to toys.

Finally, finally, I got the garland in a somewhat festive look. It’s still up, so I guess that the garland ties are doing their jobs. Well, at least the ones that didn’t break. But it was a lot harder than I thought it’d be.

Moral of the story: when you look at a box (or whatever it comes in) of Christmas decorations, resign yourself to the fact that you will either:

  1. Never get the decorations to look as nice as they look on the box, or
  2. Spend an amount of time roughly equivalent to a week per each of these you use to make it look so.

I had better luck with the so-called “Christmas sprays”. Luckily, these are for the most part idiot-proof. All you do is take them and place them opposite each other so that the piece of wire coming out of it (which, for some reason, is approximately as long as the spray itself is) is hidden underneath it. And lo and behold, there you have it!

Now don’t get me wrong. I still love decorating for Christmas. I just know that I’m never going to get anyone to pay me to do it. 🙂

I could be an ad exec…

I’ve always thought that a good idea for a car commercial would be to have a car pull alongside a big-rig and have the truck driver signal the driver of the car and make the “blow your horn” motion with his arm. Then the driver of the car would comply, eliciting a big kid-like grin on the trucker’s face as the car pulls away.

Now if you see that kind of commercial on the air anytime soon, be sure and tell them where to direct the royalties for the idea…

the great “interstate or 82” debate

Okay, this is the closest thing to a useless thought that I’ve ever put on this page. But it’s something that I’ve dealt with for four years now, and will for at least two more (plus the title is a nifty piece of alliteration), so here goes.

The question at hand is this: when traveling from Tuscaloosa to Montgomery, and vice versa, which route is quicker, going interstate all the way through Birmingham, or using US-82, which goes straight to Montgomery? Obviously, 82 provides a more direct route, but at the cost of only being able to go 55 miles an hour (legally) over most of the trip. So let’s take a look, piece by piece, of the 82 trip and see how long it takes compared to the interstate route. We’ll look at it from the perspective of Tuscaloosa to Montgomery.

The first part of the trip is Tuscaloosa to Centreville, 30 miles away. This part of the trip is the only part in which one can legally go 65 mph. So this trip takes a little less than thirty minutes (about 28, to be exact). It takes about 10 minutes to get through Centreville if you have no luck and hit every red light. After you get out of Centreville, you are 55 miles away from Prattville, according to a road sign. You can only go 55 at this point, so obviously it takes you an hour to get to Prattville. It also takes about 10 minutes to get through Prattville (I get off of 82 at this point, and get on Alabama state road 6) if you have to stop at all of the traffic lights on that path. Eventually, you end up getting off of 6 onto I-65 at exit 179. Total running time: 28 + 10 + 60 + 10 minutes = 1 hour, 48 minutes.

Now, in one hour and 48 minutes, going 70 miles an hour, one can drive exactly 126 miles. So let’s figure out how far you can get down the interstate going this way…

The quickest interstate route is to go I-59 to Birmingham, then I-459 to bypass downtown, then I-65 to Montgomery. You start at exit 73 going toward Birmingham. The I-459 exit is at exit 106. 106 – 73 = 33 miles so far.

After you get on I-459 (the start of it), you have to go to exit 15 to get to I-65. 15 more miles. 48 so far.

When you get on I-65, you’ve used exit 250 to do so. To exit 179, where we got off of 82, is 71 miles. 71 + 48 = 129. But if it takes you the same amount of time to go 126 miles on this route as it did to cover the entire way on 82, that means you’re still three miles up the road from where you could have been, even if you would have stopped at every red light on the 82 route!

So why do more people go the interstate route? I think that it’s because of the illusion of speed that the interstate gives you. Plus most people will talk of getting stuck behind trucks and the like and only going 40 or so. But in all of my drives of 82, I’ve never had that experience. Plus the scenery is so much nicer when you go 82, in my opinion. It’s a nice drive.

Well, there you go…a detailed analysis of something completely useless. But at least I feel better for having said my piece. 🙂